"Whatever else it may be, at the level of chemistry life is curiously mundane...nothing you wouldn't find in any ordinary drugstore" This quote reminded me of the show called FullMetal Alchemist. It's very similar to what the protagonist, Edward Elric, said. I believe that life is much more than just elements. We are not just elements piled together to form a living being. There's a spirit and mind within us that can't be created by men. We are formed in ways that the detached scientific procedures can explain, but there's also the spiritual matter to us, and that is something science has failed to explain with the passion that it should have. Scientists don't actually believe in the spiritual part of life because it's not something that they cannot prove or confirm, just a theory and hypothesis to them. According to scientists, "seeing is believing." Apparently they've managed to see and prove that all the discoveries they've made of this Earth and universe are true to confirm that they are real.
"But there is no space, no darkness...And so, from nothing, our universe begins." What struck me about this chapter was the complexity of our universe's creation. It's so fascinating, I can't begin to fully understand it. As I read the article, I too became interested in how our universe came to be, and was impressed at how quickly and spontanously it happened, both the universe and our very existence. I'm grateful such events happened the way they did.
Also, I think the author is right when he said that science books hide the actual, interesting facts behind all the complex vocabulary and procedures explained in a difficult way that we can't fully comprehend, which is why we end up avoiding science. It makes me wonder why most science books do that. Is that something they actually need to do? Omit the real facts of the universe's creation, and whatnot? Maybe if they did elaborate on the details, thousands of questions would emerge, questions that would eventually lead them to the explanation of how the world is going to end, and, if possibly, the universe, too.
Maybe scientists and the authors of those books know more about what's happening to our planet than they actually let on. Maybe they know exactly how the world is going to end, and when. But of course, this would panick people more than they already are, so they have decided to keep such things a secret, all for the nation's sake. Is that the reason for such secrecy? Is there more to it than just the end of planet Earth, like, say, the end of the universe? Maybe not ALL of the universe, because it's basically infinite, but perhaps there would be alterations that would keep life from ever existing for a really, really long time. Maybe such alterations will lead the universe to reset itself, and start all over. Because, like the author said, all species have to get used to changes in the environment where they live, changes that occur over and over again.
Maybe the universe has grown used to radical changes and will have one eventually, it just isn't telling us. Or maybe it already did, it's the people that discovered this that don't want to tell us the truth.
I don't think we'll ever know for certain, but all those questions arose in my mind as I read the chapter. I wish there was an honest answer for these questions, to know for certain if there's any hope for life (as we know it) once this planet, and everything that we know, is over.
Well, first off I think that your thoughts about the reading were very detailed and thoughtful. I feel like you really took the time to engage yourself into the reading so that you actually got something out of it.
ReplyDeleteMy blog address: http://jnseniormath.blogspot.com/